In the Court of Time, Dignity & Productivity
The oak-paneled courtroom smelled faintly of paper, polish, and the kind of stale coffee only government buildings seem capable of producing. Fluorescent lights hummed overhead like tired jurors already regretting their civic duty.
At the front, the brass plate read: The Court of Time, Dignity & Productivity.
Judge Prudence M. Ayers presided. Hair pulled back in a bun that suggested neither mercy nor indulgence. A gavel rested at her fingertips.
The bailiff called the room to order.
The Plaintiff’s Perspective
I shifted in the wooden bench, catching myself wondering if these seats had been chosen deliberately to make economy class feel plush by comparison. Four hours in 17B — knees tucked, laptop hostage to the tray table — and I arrive not as a professional but as a husk.
This wasn’t just my case. It was everyone’s case who ever lost hours to the air, billed as if they were producing but actually trapped in limbo.
Not champagne. Not luxury. Just hours. Hours I’ll never get back.
Opening Statement — Counsel for the People
“Your honor, ladies and gentlemen of the jury,” he began, voice filling the chamber with deliberate force.
“This case is not about indulgence. It’s not about the smug grins of influencers in lie-flat pods. It’s about arithmetic. Arithmetic so basic that my client could scrawl it on the back of a bar napkin after two bourbons.”
He paced once, let the silence hang.
“Chicago to Seattle. Four hours each way. In economy, that’s zero hours of productive work. In what we propose to call the GSD Ticket — the Get Stuff Done seat — that’s three hours reclaimed per leg. Six hours total. The fare premium? Four hundred dollars. That means if an employee’s fully loaded hourly cost is more than $66.67, the upgrade pays for itself. Period.”
A ripple through the gallery — some heads nodded. Others crossed arms.
“Let me be clear: this is not about treating employees like royalty. This is about not treating them like cattle. Because if you’ve ever tried to open a MacBook in 17B, wedged between a chatty neighbor and a seatback reclined into your chest, you know it’s not just unproductive — it’s degrading. And when companies pay for degradation, they don’t just lose money. They lose people.”
He stopped. Smiled, thin and sharp.
“If you think $400 is expensive, wait until you see the cost of wasted hours.”
Defense Counsel’s Opening
The defense rose slowly, smoothing her suit as if each gesture were a performance for the jury. Her smile was knowing, practiced — the kind of expression that asked the room if it had considered whether the plaintiff’s indignation was perhaps just vanity in disguise.
“Your honor, let us not mistake self-importance for justice. The plaintiff wishes you to believe that their time is so precious, so indispensable, that four hundred dollars a flight is but a trifle compared to the brilliance trapped within row 2. But I ask you: if time is money, is it fair to buy some workers better hours at thirty thousand feet while others jostle with pretzels in row 27?”
She let the question hang.
“Work is not done in comfort alone. It is done in grit. In compromise. In the shared experience of travel, where all employees, from interns to executives, shoulder the same inconveniences. What message does it send to declare some too valuable for pretzels while others crunch them in silence?”
Her voice dipped into irony.
“This is not about productivity. It is about prestige. It is about one class of workers wishing to escape the ordinary discomforts the rest endure. And if we permit that, we do not open the door to fairness. We open the door to hierarchy dressed as efficiency.”
The Plaintiff’s Reflection
The words stung, not because they were true, but because they carried just enough plausibility to sound true. Prestige? Prestige was a glass of bad white wine in a paper cup and a seat that let my knees exist in parallel with my torso.
Grit? I had grit. Red-eye grit, middle-seat grit, post-trip migraine grit. But grit doesn’t ship decks, doesn’t prep briefs, doesn’t close deals. Grit sits in your stomach like reheated pretzels and costs the company more than four hundred dollars in lost time every single trip.
Judge’s Admonition
Judge Ayers leaned forward.
“Counsel, you have both raised compelling points. But this Court does not decide on rhetoric alone. We will reconvene tomorrow for evidence. I want to see math. I want to see trade-offs. I want to see what this policy costs not in theory but in practice.”
The gavel struck once, echoing through the chamber.
“Until then, this court is adjourned. Counsel, I suggest you use the evening to sharpen your cases. Tomorrow, we move from words to proof.”
On the Courthouse Steps (Day One)
The crowd spilled into the cool evening air, and the courthouse steps became a theater of their own. Reporters surged forward, cameras flashing, microphones thrust at both counsel.
The plaintiff’s lawyer raised his chin, answering the first question with deliberate provocation:
“Let’s be clear. The company’s policy isn’t saving money — it’s wasting it. Four hundred dollars sounds big until you realize how much productivity is lost crammed in the back. You wouldn’t cut corners on laptops or software. Why do it with time?”
The defense, not missing a beat, smiled for the cameras.
“And yet, if productivity is measured by comfort, then where does it end? Shall we hold strategy sessions in spas? Productivity is not a seat upgrade — it’s discipline. It’s grit. And grit isn’t purchased with legroom.”
The crowd murmured, some scribbling notes, others nodding along.
The jury had gone home, but the court of public opinion was still in session. Day One closed not with resolution, but with spectacle — and both sides already angling for tomorrow’s headlines.
Day Two — Evidence Entered into the Record
The morning light through the courthouse windows seemed harsher than yesterday, as if the sun itself had come to cross-examine. The gallery was fuller too — word of yesterday’s theatrics had spread. Jurors shuffled in, reporters filled the back benches, and the air held the crackle of anticipation.
Judge Ayers struck the gavel once.
“Counsel, yesterday was words. Today, we deal in proof. Proceed.”
The Exhibits
Exhibit A — The Arithmetic
Chicago ↔ Seattle, ~4 hrs each way.
- Economy: 0 hrs productive.
- GSD Ticket: 3 hrs regained per leg = 6 hrs total.
- Fare premium: $400.
- Break-even = $66.67/hr.
Exhibit B — The Cohort
- Salary range: $90k–$130k/year.
- Hourly (salary-only): $43–$62.
- Fully loaded (benefits, taxes, overhead): $58–$84.
Exhibit C — Real Trip Models
Two-day offsite + 2 travel days:
- Economy: 32 hrs lost.
- GSD Ticket: 26 hrs lost.
Three-day offsite + 2 travel days:
- Economy: 40 hrs lost.
- GSD Ticket: 34 hrs lost.
Exhibit D — The Trade Ledger
- Swag bag opt-out = $100–$200 saved.
- One catered team meal/day = $400+.
- Post-trip “wellness day” avoided = productivity regained.
Exhibit E — PTO & Sick Time
- 62% of workers don’t use all PTO.
- One-third of PTO value wasted annually.
- Sick leave granted: 7–8 days/year.
- Sick leave used: ~2 days/year.
Exhibit F — Intangibles with Tangible Effects
- Dignity at arrival.
- Retention signal — cheaper than losing talent.
- Offsites that start with deliverables, not hangovers.
Exhibit G — The Road-Warrior Clause
Acknowledgment: some love travel. For them, economy is part of the game. For others, it’s silent attrition. The GSD Ticket is an opt-in, not a blanket upgrade.
Exhibit H — The ROI Trigger Rule
Policy template:
Approve GSD Ticket if: Fare premium ≤ (Hours regained × Fully loaded hourly rate).
Auditable, repeatable, fair.
Objections and Sparring
The defense rose: “Optics, your honor. Upgrading looks elitist.”
Plaintiff’s counsel shot back: “Optics? We don’t question laptops with different specs by role. Why do we suddenly demand uniformity at 35,000 feet?”
“Fairness,” the defense said crisply. “All employees should travel the same.”
“Fairness is not sameness,” came the reply. “Equity means equipping each role for maximum output.”
The defense tried once more: “Precedent. Approve once, and you’ll approve forever.”
“Then codify it with the ROI Trigger Rule,” plaintiff’s counsel retorted. “Clear math, not favoritism.”
The judge allowed the sparring, pen scratching furiously across her notes as the gallery leaned forward.
Closing Statements
For the People:
“This is not about prestige. It is not about perks. It is about math. Six hours regained, $400 invested. If you can’t see the ROI in that, you’re in the wrong business.”
For the Defense:
“And yet, if work is measured by comfort, then what next? Massages at the gate? There is danger in mistaking convenience for competence.”
Judge Ayers:
“This court will deliberate. Case remains under advisement.”
The gavel echoed once more.
On the Courthouse Steps (Day Two)
By the time the lawyers emerged, the courthouse steps were a frenzy. Cameras flashed, microphones were shoved forward, and the public gallery spilled into the street.
The plaintiff’s lawyer raised his voice above the chaos:
“Let’s be blunt. Companies already pay for lost hours — they just bury the cost. We’re not asking for champagne. We’re asking to stop lighting money on fire.”
The defense, arch smile steady, raised a hand for silence:
“Comfort masquerading as efficiency. That’s today’s sales pitch. But tomorrow? Tomorrow it’s about grit, and the reminder that productivity isn’t bought with legroom, but earned through discipline.”
A reporter shouted: “Are you saying your client isn’t disciplined?”
The defense paused — then let the silence answer for her.
Meanwhile, the plaintiff’s lawyer leaned closer to the cameras:
“If this were your time, your family, your productivity, would you really argue that four hundred dollars is too much to ask?”
The crowd stirred. Some nodded, some frowned, all scribbled. The case hadn’t been decided, but in the court of public opinion, the trial was far from over.
🎙 Hear more irreverent insights on The Deductionists Podcast—available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and anywhere you get your podcasts.
🔗 Listen now:
👉 Apple Podcasts
👉 Spotify
Subscribe to the Newsletter on LinkedIn: The Deductionists Newsletter.